MINUTES OF THE $14^{\text {TH }}$ MEETING HELD ON 03/09/2010 AT 11.00 AM IN CONFERENCE ROOM NO. 190, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF JS(SR)

In compliance with the directions dated 17.04.2007 of the Hon’ble High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur in Writ Petition No. 445/2001 in the matter of Godbole and others versus Union of India and others the 14th Meeting of the Committee was held under the Chairmanship of Shri Rajeev Kapoor, Joint Secretary (SR), DOPT on 03/09/2010 at 11.00 AM in conference Room no. 190, North Block. The meeting was attended by the following:-

Shri V.S. Niranjan Shri A.K. Topo Shri Muktesh Vashney Shri K.P.K. Nambissan Shri N. Siddiqui, Shri M.L. Uikey,

Shri S.D. Dubey Shri K. Malviya Shri M.L. Jain

Secretary, GAD, M.P. Addl. Secretay, GAD, Chhatisgarh Commissioner, Land Records, Gwalior. Deputy Secretary, Department of Personnel \& Training SE, Administration PWD, Bhopal. Addl. Director, Commissioner, Tribal Development, M.P. Bhopal.

DS, Public Health Engineering DSP, PHQ, Bhopal. Dy. Director, Administration, Agriculture, M.P.

The Chairman welcomed the members of the Committee and thereafter took up the agenda of the meeting for discussion. In the meeting the representations of State Government employees of erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh, covered by the decision dated 17.04.2007 in W.P. No. 445/2001 were individually discussed for revision of their allocation of State Cadre. The brief record of discussion in each case has been reflected in the last column of the table.

| Sl.
No. | Name of the
Petitioner | W.P.
No. | Decision taken |
| — | — | — | — |
| 1 | Shri Ramsekhar
Katiyar, RAEO | $2395 / 08$ | The Committee noted that these five petitioners did not
submit any representations so far in compliance of
directions dated 17.04.2007 of Hon’ble’ High Court.
The Committee decided that D/o Agriculture might
issue a letter to these petitioners for submitting their
representations within a month’s time failing which it
would be construed that they have nothing to say and
the matter would be disposed off accordingly. |
| 2 | Shri Trun Kumar
Dwivedi, RAEO | $2024 / 08$ | |
| 3 | Shri RA Sharma,
RAEO | $2024 / 08$ | |
| 4 | Shri Ramvilas
Yadav, RAEO | $3800 / 08$ | |
| 5 | Shri Dhaal Singh,
Revenue Inspector | $2369 / 08$ | || 6 | Shri Bhagwan Das
Guha, RAEO | $3177 / 08$ | The petitioner has sought revision of State Cadre from Chhattisgarh to M.P. on the ground of his domicile, option for M.P. and his family circumstances. The Committee recommended his application for rejection as these grounds are not covered under the existing guidelines of allocation. |
| — | — | — | — |
| 7 | Shri Santosh Kumar
Asati, Sub-Engineer, D/o Rural Development | $5520 / 08$ | The representative of State Government informed that earlier the petitioner was not allocated to the State cadre as his name was missing in the gradation list of Sub-Engineers. On the recommendation of State Government, the Committee decided to recommend his allocation to the State of M.P. as per his eligibility on the basis of his seniority rank in the gradation list. |
| 8 | Shri Pahalwan Singh Kshatriya, Head Constable ( $5^{\text {th }} \mathrm{Bn}$ ) | $3178 / 08$ | The Committee noted that the petitioners are non State Cadre employees and as per guidelines of allocation the non State Cadre employees stand allocated to the State |
| 9 | Shri Gajender Singh, D/o Home | $2605 / 08$ | where they were working on the appointed day viz. 01/11/2000. Hence the Committee decided to reject the |
| 10 | Shri Kalyan Singh
Marko, Revenue
Inspector | $861 / 08$ | representations of the petitioners for change of their allocation from Chhattisgarh to M.P. as their request is not covered by the guidelines on allocation. |
| 11 | Shri Vijay Bahadur Dubey, Tracer | $861 / 08$ | The Committee noted that the petitioner has sought revision of his state Cadre on the ground that he has opted for M.P. and he is not a domicile of Chhattisgarh. The Committee decided to reject the representation of the petitioner for change of his allocation from Chhattisgarh to M.P. as his request is not covered by the guidelines. |

1. The Committee considered the representations of the following employees of erstwhile M.P. and decision of the Committee has been reflected against each case as under:-

| S. No. | Name,
Designation and
Department | Decision |
| — | — | — |
| 1. | Shri Satish Kumar
Srivastava, Lecturer,
D/o Tribal Welfare | On the recommendation of State Government, the Committee
decided to recommend accepting the representation of Shri Srivastava
for revision of his State Cadre from Chhattisgarh to Madhya Pradesh as
his dependent mother Smt. Malti Devi is suffering from cancer, which
is covered by the existing guidelines of allocation. |
| 2. | Shir Santosh Kumar
Khatri, Asstt. Gr.-II,
Social Welfare | On the recommendation of State Government, the Committee
decided to recommend accepting the representation of Shri Santosh
Kumar Khatri, for revision of his State Cadre from Chhattisgarh to
Madhya Pradesh on the ground that he himself and his parents are the
victims of Bhopal Gas tragedy and received a compensation of more
than Rs. 50000/-. || 3. | Shri Radheylal Nirmalkar, Asstt. Gr.-III, Social Welfare | On the request of State Government, the Committee decided to defer the consideration of this case and decided that State Government would include this case in the agenda for the next meeting with full facts of this case inter-alia confirming that he belongs to State cadre. The State Government would also confirm whether the applicant has received a compensation of Rs. 50000/- on account of suffering from Bhopal Gas tragedy. |
| :–: | :–: | :–: |
| 4. | Shri Prabhat Kumar Tailang, Asstt. Statistical Officer, D/o Agriculture | On the recommendation of State Government, the Committee decided to recommend accepting the representation of Shri Prabhat Kumar Tailang for revision of his State Cadre from Chhattisgarh to Madhya Pradesh on the ground that his wife Smt. Shalini Tailang is a victim of Bhopal Gas tragedy and received a compensation of Rs. 50000/-. |
| 5. | Shri A.R. Gajbhaiye, Sub-Engineer, PHE | The Committee decided to recommend the representation of Shri Gajbhaiye, Sub-Engineer, for accepting for revision of State Cadre from Chhatisgarh to M.P. under the spouse policy subject to the condition that Department of Public Health Engineering would confirm that the wife of the applicant is a State Govt. employee and was serving in the State Government prior to re-organisation of the erstwhile state of M.P. |
| 6. | Dr. Umashankar Gupta, AMO, Medical Education | On the recommendation of State Government the Committee decided to recommend accepting the representation of Shri Umashankar Gupta for revision of his State Cadre from Chhattisgarh to M.P. on the ground that his wife Smt. Premlata Gupta is working as Asstt. Grade – II (Civil Reader) O/o District and Session Judge, Tikamgarh, Madhya Pradesh w.e.f. 23.02.1981 as this case is covered under the spouse policy. |
| 7. | Shri Mahesh Prasad Raghuvanshi, Asstt. Engineer, WRD | The Committee noted that Dr.(Smt.) Rekha Raghuvanshi, the wife of applicant Shri Mahesh Prasad Raghuvanshi has been working as Medical Officer since 23.01 .89 in the M.P. Government and moreover she is a victim of Bhopal Gas tragedy and received a compensation of Rs. 50000/- on this account. Hence on the recommendation of State Government, the Committee decided to recommend accepting the representation of Shri Mahesh Prasad Raghuvanshi for revision of his State Cadre from Chhattisgarh to M.P. as his case is covered under the guidelines of allocation. |
| 8. | Shri Makrand Golwalkar, Asstt. Engineer, WRD | On the recommendation of State Government the Committee decided to recommend accepting the representation of Shri Golwarkaer, for revision of his State Cadre from Chhattisgarh to M.P. on the ground that his wife Smt. Archana Golwarkar is working as Asstt. Teacher in Kendriya Vidhylaya -3, Bhopal, M.P. w.e.f. 20.08 .1994 as this case is covered under the existing guidelines of allocation under spouse policy. |

The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the chair.