A committee convened on January 11, 2008, to review requests from 16 employees concerning their allocation. Decisions were made on a case-by-case basis. Several employees were allocated to Chhattisgarh based on seniority, with their requests for allocation changes being denied due to a lack of significant points. Some cases were deemed outside the committee’s purview as the employees were not state government employees. One individual was recommended for allocation to Madhya Pradesh due to their wife’s mental illness. Others working in Chhattisgarh had their requests to remain met, with no objection from the government of Madhya Pradesh. Some requests were also met with no further action required. In one instance, an allocation was revised to Chhattisgarh by the Government of India.
SOURCE PDF LINK :
Click to access 5sac_11012008.pdf.pdf
Click to view full document content
The fifth meeting of the Committee was held on 11.1.2008 and representations of 16 employees were considered on case to case basis and decision in each case has been indicated below in the last column of the table:
| Sl. No. | Name of the Petitioner | Petition No. | Recommendations of the Committee |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr. Hardayal Goyal, Ayurved Medical Officer | 298/04 | Allocated to Chhatisgarh on juniority basis. No considerable points for change of allocation. Hence request may not be accepted. |
| 2 | R P Keshwani | 2467/01 | The case does not fall within the purview of the Committee because the employee is not state Government employee. Hence no decision of the Committee is required. |
| 3 | Smt K Maseeh Asstt. | 2467/01 | Not in the perview of the committee. Not a government employee. Hence no decision is required. |
| 4 | Devi Ram Kurmi, Asstt. Gr. III | 2467/01 | Not in the purview of the committee. Not a government employee. Hence no decision is required. |
| 5 | Shri Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Paryavekshak | 2874/06 | Working in Chhattisgarh. Wants to stay back in Chhattisgarh. Govt. of M.P. has no objection to put him in Chhattisgarh. If he is not allocated to either of the States, he may be allocated to Chhattisgarh. || 6 | Mayaram Chourasia, Head Constable (Telecom) | 2889/03 | As per the medical certificate given by the Gwalior Manasik Arogyasala Psychiatriest, on the basis of wife’s mental illness, as per the guidelines, he may be allocated to Madhya Pradesh. |
| :–: | :–: | :–: | :–: |
| 7 | Govind Singh Sengar, Constable | 3025/04 | Already working in Madhya Pradesh. Petitioner’s request has been met. No action is required. |
| 8 | Karan Singh, Constable | 3025/04 | Already working in Madhya Pradesh. Petitioner’s request has been met. No action is required |
| 9 | Virendra Choubey, Constable | 3025/04 | Already working in Madhya Pradesh. Petitioner’s request has been met. No action is required |
| 10 | Ratanlal, Constable | 4637/04 | Allocated on juniority basis. No considerable points for change of allocation. Hence request may be rejected |
| 11 | Rajesh Thakur, Constable | 4815/04 | Relieved to join in MP from Chhattisgarh. Request has been met. No action is required. |
| 12 | A.K. Nag, Tahsildar | 2484/01 | Allocated to Chhattisgarh by the Govt. of India. Request has been met. No action is required. |
| 13 | Rameswar Dayal Mourya, Inspector |
320/04 | Already working in Chhattisgarh. As per his request dated 7.12 .07 , he wants to continue in Chhattisgarh. Not willing to come to M.P. Hence no action is required. |
| 14 | M.R. Tirkey, Tahsildar | 637/02 | Allocation revised to Chhattisgarh by Govt. of India. Request has been met. No action is required. |
| 15 | Sriram Bhatti, Tahsildar | 129/02 | Allocated to Chhattisgarh. Request has been met. No action is required. |
| 16 | Kunwar Kujur, Asst. Superintendent Landrecords | 912/01 | Allocated to Chhattisgarh. Request has been met. No action is required. |