The fourth meeting of the Committee, held on December 13, 2007, reviewed representations from 43 employees. Decisions were made on a case-by-case basis, addressing requests such as allocations to Madhya Pradesh, retirements, mutual transfers, and the status of non-state cadre employees. Some cases required no further action, while others involved recommendations for rejection based on specific criteria like juniority basis or the applicant’s request.
SOURCE PDF LINK :
Click to access 4sac_13122007.pdf.pdf
Click to view full document content
The fourth meeting of the Committee was held on 13.12.2007 and representations of 43 employees were considered on case to case basis and decision in each case has been indicated below in the last column of the table:
| Sl. No. | Name of the Petitioner Shri | Petition No. | Recommendations of the Committee (Pages 131-184) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Satish Bagdare, Lab Technician | 1901/03 | Already allocated to MP as per his request. No action is required. |
| 2 | Ramkumar Sharma, Asstt. Stat. Officer | 2166/03 | Retired on VRS, No action is required |
| 3 | Dr. Surya Prakash Upadhyaya, Asstt Vet., Surgeon | 4889/04 | Already joined MP on mutual transfer basis. Relief has already been done. No action is required. |
| 7 | Mohan Lal Sahu, Teacher | 310/04 | Non-State cadre employee. Working as per the Central Government guidelines. Hence no action is required. |
| 8 | Deenbandhu Verma, Supervisor | 2904/03 | -do- || 9 | Shambhu Prasad Mishra, Opthal. Asstt. | 216/05 | -do- |
| :–: | :–: | :–: | :–: |
| 10 | Rajgiri Goswami, Multipurpose Health worker | 1741/05 | -do- |
| 11 | Shankar Dayal Misra, Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 12 | Brij Kumar Tiwari, Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 13 | Sukhlal Singh Maravi, Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 14 | Kasi Prasad Viswakarma, Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 15 | Gulzar Prasad Varma, Asstt Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do |
| 16 | Govind Prasad, $D$ wivedi Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 17 | Tejpratap Gupta, Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do |
| 18 | Long Singh Mahley, Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 19 | Ramayan Prasad Yadav, Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 20 | Laxman (as) Saket, Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 21 | Vijay Bahadur Singh, Asstt. Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 22 | Ram Kelawan Singh, Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 23 | Ram Sewak Srivastava, Rev. Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 24 | Shriniwas Gupta. Rev Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 25 | Gajanan Prasad Gajitam, Rev Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 26 | Ram Laloo Sharma, Rev Inspector | 197/02 | -do- |
| 27 | B.R. Godbole, Sanitory Inspector | 445/01 | Local body Non-state cadre employee apptinted by local body which is not to be divided. Hence no action is required |
| 28 | Toran Prasad Sahu, Asst. Rev Inspector | 446/01 | -do- |
| 29 | Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sahu, Asstt. Rev Inspector | 499/01 | -do- |
| 30 | Dilip Tiwari, Revenue Inspector | 503/01 | -do- || 31 | Angaru Singh Dhruv. Asst. Rev Inspector | $583 / 01$ | -do- |
| :–: | :–: | :–: | :–: |
| 32 | Ildan Bada, Lineman | $597 / 01$ | -do- |
| 33 | Heth Ram Sahu, Asstt. Rev Inspector |
$600 / 01$ | Local body Non-state cadre employee appointed by local body which is not to be divided. Hence no action is required |
| 34 | Heth Ram Patel, Asstt. Revenue Inspector |
$628 / 01$ | -do- |
| 35 | Vidya Prakash Sharma, Asst. Revenue Inspector | $628 / 01$ | -do- |
| 36 | Sh Ganesh Das Manikpuri, LDC |
$628 / 01$ | -do- |
| 37 | Govind Ram Sahu Asstt. Rev Inspector |
$695 / 01$ | -do- |
| 38 | Himanshu Tiwari. Revenue Inspector |
$752 / 01$ | -do- |
| 39 | Kedram Sahu, Asstt. Gr.II |
$826 / 01$ | -do- |
| 40 | Vishnu Prasad Sharma, Exeecutive Engineer | $1482 / 01$ | Allotted to Chhattisgarh State as per the request of the applicant. Hence no action is required |
| 41 | Sh Rajiv Lochan Pandey, Chief Municipal Officer | $920 / 02$ | -do- |
| 42 | Sh Sukhdeo Prasad Karosia, Inspector | $2263 / 01$ | Allocated to Chhattisgarh on juniority basis. Sh. Sitaram Chopra, junior to him has been allocated to MP on mutual transfer basis. Hence recommended for rejection |
| 43 | Sh Gopilal Bharati. Inspector |
$321 / 04$ | Allocated on juniority basis. The point indicated in the application/representation can’t become basis for change of state allocation. Hence recommended for rejection |