This document details the compliance with a High Court order from Uttarakhand directing the Union of India to decide on a representation. Smt. Maheshwari Devi, a Staff Nurse, had requested reallocation to Uttarakhand from Uttar Pradesh under the ‘spouse policy’ because her husband is a state government employee in Uttarakhand. After considering her representation and information from...
This document details a decision made by the Government of India regarding the allocation of Shri Ashok Kumar, a BCG Technician. Following directions from the Hon’ble High Court in Nainital (W.P. No.381/2006), a committee headed by Dr. S.K. Sarkar reviewed representations concerning Shri Ashok Kumar. The committee determined that he is a domicile of Uttar Pradesh and was mistakenly...
This document details the decision regarding the representation of Shri Jugal Kishore Bhatt, a Block Organizer, concerning his allocation. Following the directions of the Hon’ble High Court, Nainital, a committee reviewed Shri Bhatt’s representation. The committee noted that Shri Bhatt was ranked at S.No.14/15 on the seniority list, but only 13 posts of Block Organizer were allocated...
This document details a decision regarding the reallocation request of Shri Salgu Yadav, a Tractor Driver in the Jail Department. Following a High Court order, a committee reviewed his representation. The committee recommended accepting his request, noting that his superannuation date was within a year. Consequently, the Government of India has approved his continued service in Uttar Pradesh...
This document announces an update to the fee structure for government counsels. Initially, a revised fee was introduced on February 1, 2008, changing the payment from a flat fee of Rs. 2,250 per case to Rs. 2,250 for an effective hearing and Rs. 300 for a non-effective hearing. However, this revision had a demoralizing effect on counsels, particularly in cases resolved in a single hearing...
This document addresses the representation of Smt. Kanchan Bala, a Pharmacist, concerning a change in her allocation from Uttar Pradesh to Uttarakhand. The matter was reviewed by a committee following directions from the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad in W.P. No. 1563/2009. The committee noted that Smt. Kanchan Bala’s husband was appointed in 2006, and personnel appointed after...
This document communicates a decision regarding the representation of Shri Ghanshyam, Chief Pharmacist. Following directions from the Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand, Nainital, a committee reviewed his case. The committee found that while Shri Ghanshyam’s wife was appointed in March 2005, personnel appointed after November 9, 2000, are not covered under the spouse policy of the...
This communication from the Department of Personnel & Training, Ministry of Personnel, P.G. and Pensions, addresses the case of the late Shri Raghuveer Kureel, an employee of Rajya Niyojan Sansthan, Planning Department. The State Advisory Committee decided that if an employee allocated by the Government of India dies before being relieved due to a court stay order, their dues and pension...
This communication from the Ministry of Personnel, P.G. and Pensions, Department of Personnel & Training, addresses the representation of Shri Anoop Kumar Mishra. A State Advisory Committee meeting on October 20, 2009, considered his case, noting that his wife, appointed as Sr. Operator at City Control Room, Lucknow, on February 11, 1997, made him eligible under the spouse policy. The...
This document details several decisions made by the Government of India concerning the reallocation of employees to successor states, specifically Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. These decisions are based on directives from the High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, and were considered by a committee chaired by the Joint Secretary (A,T, A&CS). Several individuals, including Shri Devisharan...