This document details the minutes of the 9th meeting of a committee held on November 25, 2008, to discuss the allocation of 14 State Government employees of the former Madhya Pradesh. The meeting was convened in compliance with a High Court of Chhattisgarh directive. The committee, chaired by Dr. S.K. Sarkar, reviewed individual representations for the revision of their allocation. In most cases, the committee recommended the rejection of these requests, citing that the grounds raised were not covered by the existing guidelines. However, in two instances, the committee recommended the revision of allocation for employees from Chhattisgarh to Madhya Pradesh. One case was deferred for further information, and another was deferred for the next meeting pending clarification.
SOURCE PDF LINK :
Click to access 9sac_25112008.pdf.pdf
Click to view full document content
MINUTES OF THE $9^{\text {th }}$ MEETING HELD ON 25.11 .2008 AT 2.00 PM UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF JS(AT\&SR) IN ROOM NO. 190
In compliance with the directions dated 17.04 .2007 of the Hon’ble High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur in Writ Petition No. 445/2001 in the matter of Godbole and others versus Union of India and others, the $9^{\text {th }}$ meeting the Committee was held under the Chairmanship of Dr. S.K.Sarkar, Joint Secretary (AT, A \&SR), DOPT at 2.00 PM in Room No.190, North Block. The meeting was attended by the following:-
Shri Sudesh Kumar
Shri Jawahar Shrivastava
Shri V. Peddanna
Principal Secretary, GAD, Govt. of MP Secretary,GAD, Government of Chhattisgarh Deputy Secretary, DOPT(SRS)
The Chairman welcomed the members of the Committee and thereafter took up the agenda for discussion. In this meeting representations of 14 State Government employees of erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh, covered by the decision dated 17.04.2007 in W.P. No. 445/2001 were individually discussed for revision of their allocation. Brief record of discussion and recommendations of the Committee in each case has been reflected in the last column of the table.
| Sl. No. |
Name of the Petitioner | Petition No. |
Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R.S.Dubey RAEO |
2024/08 | Shri R.S.Dubey was allocated to Chhattisgarh on juniority basis. Grounds raised for revision of allocation are not covered under guidelines. The Committee recommended for rejection of his representation. |
| 2 | R.K.Gupta RAEO |
2024/08 | Shri R.K.Gupta was allocated to Chhattigarh on juniority basis. Grounds raised for revision of allocation are not covered under the guidelines. The Committee recommended for rejection of his representation. |
| 3 | R.K.Agarwal RAEO |
2024/08 | Shri R.K.Agarwal was allocated to Chhattisgarh on juniority basis. Grounds indicated for revision of allocation are not covered under the guidelines. The Committee recommended for rejection of representation. |
| 4 | Banwari Singh Rajput | 1349/08 | Shri Banwari Singh Rajput was allocated to Chhattisgarh on juniority basis. || | | SDAO | | Grounds raised for revision of allocation are not covered under the guidelines. Shri Rajput belongs to state cadre. The Committee recommended for rejection of his representation. |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | Atul Kumar Harne RAEO | 2633/08 | The Committee found that Shri Atul Kumar Harne was allocated to Chhattisgarh on juniority basis. Grounds raised for revision of allocation are not covered under the guidelines. Hence the Committee recommended for rejection of his representation. | |
| 6 | Ravinder Purohit Draftsman | 2024/08 | Shri Ravinder Purohit belongs to state cadre. His allocation was done as per guidelines. He was allocated on juniority basis. Grounds raised for revision of allocation are not covered under the guidelines. The Committee recommended for rejection of his representation. | |
| 7 | Nanak Singh Dhurve RAEO | 3177/08 | Shri Nanak Singh Dhurve belongs to a non-state cadre. As per guidelines non-state cadre employees are to be allocated to a state where they were working at the time of allocation. Since he was working in Chhattisgarh at the time of allocation, Committee found that he was allocated as per guidelines and recommend for rejection of representation for revision of his allocation. | |
| 8 | Badriprasad Jawaria RAEO | 1349/08 | Shri Badriprasad Jawaria belongs to State cadre and allocated on juniority basis, as per guidelines. The grounds raised for revision of allocation including the disease of his wife are not covered under guidelines. Hence the Committee recommend for rejection of his representation. | |
| 9 | Dharamder Kumar Dubey and Ram Prasad | 2397/08 | Shri Dharamender Kumar Dubey and Shri Ram Prasad are class IV employees. The Committee recommended for revision of their allocation from Chhattisgarh to MP, as per guidelines. | |
| 10. | Abay Asthana Sub Engineer | 2397/08 | Decision has been deferred for want of confirmation whether wife of the || | | | | |
| — | — | — | — |
| 11. | Ved Prakash Mishra, Sub Engineer |
$6590 / 05$ | |
| 12. | Dilip Saudagar, Asstt. Gr.I |
$1328 / 08$ | The wife of Shri Dilip Saudagar is suffering from migrane which is not a identified medical hardship for revision of allocation and is not covered under guidelines. Hence, the Committee recommended for rejection of his representation. |
| 13. | Dr.R.P.Shukla Vaterinary Asstt. Surgeon |
$4515 / 05$ | Based on the information provided by both the State Govts the Committee came to the conclusion that petitioner belongs to Animal Husbandry Department and not Panchayat and Rural Development Department. |
| Based on the information provided to the Committee by the Department of Animal Husbandary he was allocated to Chhatttisgarh on juniority basis on 7.9.2002, as per guidelines. The Committee recommended for rejection of his representation for his fresh allocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh in the Department of Panchayat and Rural Development where he was on deputation. No further action is called for so far is allocation matter is concerned. |
The meeting ended with a vote thanks of to the Chair