BY SPEED POST/BY E-MAIL

F. No. 14/36/2006-SR(S)-Vol.-VIII
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances & Pensions
(Department of Personnel & Training)

3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan,
Khan Market, New Delhi-110003
Dated: 12th May, 2021

To

The Additional Chief Secretary,
Department of General Administration
Government of Madhya Pradesh,
Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan,
Bhopal-462004. (Madhya Pradesh)

The Secretary,
Department of General Administration,
Government of Chhattisgarh,
Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan,
New Raipur- 492101. (Chhattisgarh)

Subject: Minutes of the meeting held on 21.10.2020 with State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh through video conference regarding.

Sir,

I am directed to forward herewith the minutes of the meeting held on 21.10.2020 with State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh through video conference to consider the representations of State Government employees received in compliance of Hon’ble High Court’s directions and other issues relating to allocation.

1. Kindly acknowledge the receipt of the minutes. The order regarding acceptance/rejection of the representations would be issued separately by the Central Government.

2. The minutes can also be downloaded from the website of this Department i.e. https://dopt.gov.in/Aboutus/Wings/DivisionsinDOPT/StateReorganizationDivision/Minutes(MadhyaPradesh/Chhattisgarh).

Yours faithfully,

Encl.:- As above.

(Shmah)

(SS.K. Mandi)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Tel: 011-24651898
E-mail: sunil.mandi@nic.in# Minutes of the meeting held, through video conference, on 21.10.2020 at 3:00 pm to consider the representations of the employees of the successor States of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh and other related matters

Smt. G. Jayanthi, Joint Secretary (Estt.), D/o Personnel \& Training, Govt. of India chaired a meeting, held through video conference, with the officers of Government of Madhya Pradesh and Government of Chhattisgarh, to discuss the representations submitted by the employees of the successor States of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, carved out of the erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh, seeking revision of their allocation already made and other related issues.
2. At the outset, Joint Secretary (Estt.), DoPT, drew attention of the participants to the decision of the Advisory Committee in its $27^{\text {th }}$ meeting held on 06.10 .2016 to retain State Government employees, who are due for retirement within two years from 01.04.2016 i.e. till 31.03 .2018 , in the State of their existing posting and subsequent decision of the Committee in its $28^{\text {th }}$ meeting held on 06.03 .2019 to extend the cut-off date for such retention till 31.03 .2020 in view of enhancement of the retirement age from 60 years to 62 years in both the States i.e. Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. She drew attention to the judgement dated 05.03 .2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh (Gwalior Bench) in WP No. 1361/2014 and 17 other connected Writ Petitions wherein the Hon’ble High Court observed that about 20 years have already elapsed since the time of original allocation and during this period the petitioners have been rendering their services in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The Hon’ble Court further directed the Petitioners to file fresh representations for their reallocation and directed that the Advisory Committee shall dwell upon the question of retaining services of the petitioners in the State of Madhya Pradesh in view of efflux of time and pass a self-contained speaking order, in accordance with law. Given the position that a number of the petitioners are left with less than two years for retirement, it has been decided with the concurrence of the both the State Governments that those petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years as on the date of the meeting may be retained in the State they are serving as on date.
3. As regards the petitioners who are left with more than two years’ service for retirement as on the date of the meeting and where both the State Governments are agreeable to the revision of allocation of such petitioners, Joint Secretary (Estt.), DoPT invited attention to the DoPT’s letter No. 14/279/2002-SR(S) dated 08.06.2006 wherein it was conveyed to the State Governments that it is open to them to consider such requests for revision of allocation based on broad consensus arrived at between them, inter-alia, either by defining the terms and conditions for such consideration or by framing suitable rules for the purpose. These cases will be considered separately on case-to-case basis in consultation with both the State Govts.
4. In all 54 cases were considered in the meeting. These cases, along with decisions taken thereon, are indicated in the Annexure. In a number of cases where the petitioners have been considered for revision of their allocation, the State Governments conveyed their ‘no objection’/consent to such revision in the meeting.
5. The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the chair.| S.
No. | Name \& Designation \& WP/WA/RP
directions
(S/Shri) | Category under which the case is covered/considered | Response of State Govts. | Decision taken in the meeting |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Department of Water Resources | | | | |
| 1. | Shri Narendra Kumar Gupta,
Assistant Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 14.12.2005 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 3821/2005 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed no objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 14.12.2005 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh and in view of the consent of both the States, allocation of Sh. Narendra Kumar Gupta may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working, in terms of decision for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020. |
| 2. | Shri Arun Pandit,
Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 14.12.2005 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 2078/2005 and WP No. 11658/2019 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 14.12.2005 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh and in view of the consent of both the States, allocation of Sh. Arun Pandit may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working, in terms of decision for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court in WP No. 11658/2019. |
| 3. | Shri Rajendra Kumar Gupta,
Sub-Engineer | Expired while in service | State Govt. confirmed his death while in service in the State of Madhya Pradesh | Sh. Rajendra Kumar Gupta is deemed allocated to State of Madhya Pradesh where he served last in terms of this Department’s letter dated 11.08.2008. || | Compliance of directions dated 14.12.2019 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in W.P. No. 9574/2012 | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 4. | Shri Subhash Chandra Gupta,
Assistant Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 849/2014 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior and in view of the consent of both the States, allocation of Sh. Subhash Chandra Gupta may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working, in terms of decision for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020. |
| 5. | Shri Mahesh Kumar Shrivastava, Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 21.08.2009 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 4606/2006
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 3359/2015
Review Petition No. 489/2020 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 21.08.2009 and 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior and in view of the consent of both the States, allocation of Sh. Mahesh Kumar Shrivastava may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working, in terms of decision for retention of the employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in Review Petition No. 489/2020. |
| 6. | Shri K.L. Janghela,
Personal Assistant | Retired from service | State Govt. confirmed his retirement from the State of Madhya Pradesh | Sh. K.L. Janghela is deemed allocated to State of Madhya Pradesh where he served last in terms of this Department’s || | WP No. 12888/2006 | | | letter dated 11.08.2008. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 7. | Shri Ravi Kumar Mishra, Sub-Engineer
WP No. 17612/2007 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. Ravi Kumar Mishra may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| 8. | Shri Shiv Shankar Gupta,
Sub-Engineer
WP No. 11908/2012 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. Shiv Shankar Gupta may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| 9. | Shri V.K. Mahajan,
Sub-Engineer
WP No. 705/2013 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. V.K. Mahajan may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| 10. | Shri Nandkishor
Shrivastava,
Sub-Engineer | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and || | WP No. 9269/2013 | | Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. Nandkishor Shrivastava may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 11. | Shri Alok Prasad
Choudhary,
Sub-Engineer
WP No. 4821/2013 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. Alok Prasad Choudhary may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| 12. | Shri Kirti Kumar Choudhary, Sub-Engineer
WP No. 8299/2013 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. Kirti Kumar Choudhary may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| 13. | Shri Kailash Chandra Gupta, Sub-Engineer
WP No. 777/2014 | Retired from service | State Govt. confirmed his retirement from the State of Madhya Pradesh | Sh. Kailash Chandra Gupta is deemed allocated to State of Madhya Pradesh where he served last in terms of this Department’s letter dated 11.08.2008. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| 14. | Shri R.K. Shrivastava, Sub-Engineer
WP No. 6810/2013 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. R.K. || | | | Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | Shrivastava may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Public Works Department | | | | |
| 15. | Shri Pramod Kumar
Sharma,
Sub-Engineer
WP No. 55/2014 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement
As per information available in records date of his retirement is 31.12.2020. | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. However, confirmation of date of his retirement is yet to be received from his Administrative Department. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. Pramod Kumar Sharma may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working subject to confirmation of date of his retirement. Thereafter, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| Department of Farmers’ Welfare and Agriculture Development | | | | |
| 16. | Dr. Anil Kumar Sharma, SADO
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 7601/2012 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior and in view of the consent of both the States, allocation of Dr. Anil Kumar Sharma may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working, in terms of decision for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020. |
| 17. | Shri Y.S. Sanodia,
RAEO
WP No. 18117/2006 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. Y.S. Sanodia may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. || | | | | Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 18. | Shri R.K. Gaur,
RAEO
WP No. 5376/2008 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. R.K. Gaur may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| 19. | Shri Gopal Sharan Tewari, RAEO
WP No. 5980/2008 | Retired from service | State Govt. confirmed his retirement his retirement from the State of Madhya Pradesh | Sh. Gopal Sharan Tewari is deemed allocated to State of Madhya Pradesh where he served last in terms of this Department’s letter dated 11.08.2008. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| 20. | Shri R.N.S. Bhadoria,
SADO
WP No. 7908/2013 | Retired from service | State Govt. confirmed his retirement from the State of Madhya Pradesh | Sh. R.N.S. Bhadoria is deemed allocated to State of Madhya Pradesh where he served last in terms of this Department’s letter dated 11.08.2008. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| | | | Department of Ayush | |
| 21. | Dr. Mohammad Iqbal Khan, Ayurvedic Medical Officer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 1361/2014 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior and in view of the consent of both the States, allocation of Dr. Mohammad Iqbal Khan may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working, in terms of decision for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020. || Department of Public Health Engineering | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 22. | Shri Dinesh Babu Mishra, Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 5303/2014 | Retired from service | State Govt. confirmed his retirement from the State of Madhya Pradesh | Allocation already revised vide order dated 08.12.2016. No further action is required. The matter is being dropped. |
| 23. | Shri Dinesh Chandra Ojha, Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 7770/2014 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior and in view of the consent of both the States, allocation of Sh. Dinesh Chandra Ojha may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working, in terms of decision for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020. |
| 24. | Shri Uttam Kumar Madankar, Sub-Engineer
WP No. 1836/2015 | Retired from service
As per information available with this Department his date of retirement is 30.09.2020. | Confirmation of date of his retirement is yet to be received from his Administrative Department. | Sh. Uttam Kumar Madankar is deemed allocated to State of Madhya Pradesh where he served last in terms of this Department’s letter dated 11.08.2008 subject to confirmation of his retirement. Thereafter, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| Department of Fisheries | | | | |
| 25. | Shri Virendra Kumar Shrivastava, Assistant Fisheries Officer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the | Retired from service | State Govt. confirmed his retirement from the State of Madhya Pradesh | In compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior and in terms of this Department’s letter dated 11.08.2008, Sh. Virendra Kumar Shrivastava is deemed allocated to State of Madhya Pradesh where he served last. || | Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 1191/2014 | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 26. | Shri Umesh Chandra Bhati, Asstt. Fisheries Officer
WP No. 2519/2013 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. Umesh Chandra Bhati may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| | | | Department of Home | |
| 27. | Shri Yashwant Patle,
Constable Ardali
WP No. 3076/2006 | Retired from service
As per information available with this Department his date of retirement is 30.06.2020. | Confirmation of date of his retirement is yet to be received from his Administrative Department. | Sh. Yashwant Patle is deemed allocated to State of Chhattisgarh where he served last in terms of this Department’s letter dated 11.08.2008 subject to confirmation of date of his retirement. Thereafter, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. |
| 28. | Shri Ajay Singh Bais,
Sub-Inspector
(presently posted as Inspector)
WA No. 178/2013 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement
As per information available with this Department his date of retirement is 31.08.2021 | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. However, confirmation of date of his retirement is yet to be received from his Administrative Department. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. Ajay Singh Bais may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working subject to confirmation of date of his retirement. Thereafter, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. || Department of Technical Education | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29. | Dr. Amrit Kumar Dubey,
Reader, Appl. Geology
WP No. 7137/2011 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement
As per information available with this Department his date of retirement is 31.01.2022 | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. However, confirmation of date of his retirement is yet to be received from his Administrative Department. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Dr. Amrit Kumar Dubey may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working subject to confirmation of date of his retirement. Thereafter, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. | |
| Department of Food, Civil Supply and Consumer Protection (Controller of Weights and Measures) | | | | | |
| 30. | Shri Dhirendra Kumar Jain, Inspector, Weight and Measures
WP No. 13056/2013 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Sh. Dhirendra Kumar Jain may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. | |
| Department of Public Health and Family Welfare | | | | | |
| 31. | Dr. Rajendra Prasad Gupta, Medical Officer
WP No. 7077/2010 | Left with less than two years’ service before retirement | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of the consent of both the States and in terms of decision taken for retention of the petitioners/employees who are due to retire within two years from the date of meeting with the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh i.e., 21.10.2020, allocation of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Gupta may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh where he is presently posted/working. Accordingly, an affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court. | || Department of Water Resources | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 32. | Shri Govind Prasad
Chadar,
Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 20.01.2006 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 93/2006 | Allocation under SC/ST policy | It has been confirmed that the he belongs to SC category.
Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 20.01.2006 of the Hon’ble High Court, in view of the guidelines dated 24.06.2010 for allocation of SC/ST employees and consent of the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, the allocation of Sh. Govind Prasad Chadar may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| 33. | Shri Santosh Kumar
Tantuway,
Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 27.01.2006 in WP No. 293/2006 | Allocation under SC/ST policy | It has been confirmed that the he belongs to SC category.
Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 27.01.2006 of the Hon’ble High Court, in view of the guidelines dated 24.06.2010 for allocation of SC/ST employees and consent of the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, the allocation of Sh. Santosh Kumar Tantuway may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| 34. | Shri Shridhar Lal Jatav, Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 23.01.2006 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 922/2006 | Allocation under SC/ST policy | It has been confirmed that the he belongs to SC category.
Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 23.01.2006 of the Hon’ble High Court, in view of the guidelines dated 24.06.2010 for allocation of SC/ST employees and consent of the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, the allocation of Sh. Shridhar Lal Jatav may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| 35. | Shri G.P. Silawat,
Assistant Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 15.09.2003 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in W.P. No. 20899/2003 | Allocation under SC/ST policy | It has been confirmed that the he belongs to SC category.
Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 15.09.2003 of the Hon’ble High Court, in view of the guidelines dated 24.06.2010 for allocation of SC/ST employees and consent of the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, the allocation of Sh. G.P. Silawat may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| 36. | Shri R. S. Varma, | Allocation under SC/ST policy | It has been confirmed that the he belongs to SC category. | In compliance of directions dated 15.09.2003 of the Hon’ble High Court, in view of the guidelines dated 24.06.2010 for allocation of SC/ST employees and consent of the State || | Sub – Engineer (presently posted as Assistant Engineer)
Compliance of directions dated 15.09.2003 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 20476/2003 | | Both the State Govts. conveyed No objection to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, the allocation of Sh. R. S. Varma may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Department of Water Resources | | | | |
| 37. | Shri Hari Shankar
Sharma,
Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 3768/2014 | Reallocation on medical grounds | Govt. of MP has provided relevant medical records and also conveyed ‘no objection’ for consideration of his request for reallocation.
Govt. of Chhattisgarh has conveyed its consent to his reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior and in view of the medical grounds (Kidney failure/transplant of son) on which the request for reallocation is based and consent of both the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, the allocation of Sh. Hari Shankar Sharma may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| Department of Farmers’ Welfare and Agriculture Development | | | | |
| 38. | Shri Ashok Kumar
Chaturvedi, RAEO
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 8688/2015 | Reallocation on medical grounds | Govt. of MP has provided relevant medical records and also conveyed ‘no objection’ for consideration of his request for reallocation.
Govt. of Chhattisgarh has conveyed its ‘no objection’ to his reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior and in view of the medical ground (Kidney failure /transplant of son) on which the request for reallocation is based and consent of both the State Governments of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, the allocation of Sh. Ashok Kumar Chaturvedi may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. || Department of Water Resources | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 39. | Shri Amit Kumar Kothari,
Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 01.08.2019 of Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 4306/2012 | Allocation of the employee to Govt. of Chhattisgarh was quashed by the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh on 01.08.2019. | After obtaining legal advice in the matter, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh has decided to accept the verdict.
Both the State Govts. conveyed ‘no objection’ to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 01.08.2019 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh and keeping in view legal advice taken by the State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and consent of both the State Govts., allocation of Sh. Amit Kumar Kothari may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| Department of Farmers’ Welfare and Agriculture Development | | | | |
| 40. | Shri Santosh Parmar, RAEO
Compliance of directions dated 01.08.2019 of Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 4823/2013 | Allocation of the employee to Govt. of Chhattisgarh was quashed by the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh on 01.08.2019. | After obtaining legal advice in the matter, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh has decided to accept the verdict.
Both the State Govts. conveyed ‘no objection’ to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 01.08.2019 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh and keeping in view legal advice taken by the State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and consent of both the State Govts., allocation of Sh. Santosh Parmar may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| 41. | Shri Shyam Sunder Mahajan, RAEO
Compliance of directions dated 01.08.2019 of Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 4824/2013 | Allocation of the employee to Govt. of Chhattisgarh was quashed by the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh on 01.08.2019. | After obtaining legal advice in the matter, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh has decided to accept the verdict.
Both the State Govts. conveyed ‘no objection’ to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 01.08.2019 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh and keeping in view legal advice taken by the State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and consent of both the State Govts., allocation of Sh. Shyam Sunder Mahajan may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| 42. | Shri Kailash Paan, RAEO | Allocation of the employee to Govt. of Chhattisgarh was quashed by the Hon’ble | After obtaining legal advice in the matter, Govt. of Madhya | In compliance of directions dated 01.08.2019 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh and keeping in view legal advice taken by the State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and consent of both the State Govts., allocation || | Compliance of directions dated 01.08.2019 of Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 9570/2012 | High Court of Madhya Pradesh on 01.08.2019. | Pradesh has decided to accept the verdict.
Both the State Govts. conveyed ‘no objection’ to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | of Sh. Kailash Paan may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 43. | Shri Devendra Kumar Srivastava, SADO
Compliance of directions dated 27.06.2019 of Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore in WP No. 1044/2006 | Allocation of the employee to Govt. of Chhattisgarh was quashed by the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh on 27.06.2019. | After obtaining legal advice in the matter, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh has decided to accept the verdict.
Both the State Govts. conveyed ‘no objection’ to his reallocation to the Successor State of Madhya Pradesh. | In compliance of directions dated 27.06.2019 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh and keeping in view legal advice taken by the State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and consent of both the State Govts., allocation of Sh. Devendra Kumar Srivastava may be revised from the State of Chhattisgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh. |
| Department of Water Resources | | | | |
| 44. | Shri Rakesh Bihari Dixit, Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 3549/2011 | Grounds: – serving in the State of M.P. for more than 20 years and going to retire on 30.09.2023
Request not covered under allocation guidelines | Administrative Departments in Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and Govt. of Chhattisgarh have given their consent to the retention of the employee in State of Madhya Pradesh. | The request of the employee is not covered under allocation guidelines. However, keeping in view of the directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior, his request may be considered separately in consultation with the State Govts. |
| Department of Farmers’ Welfare and Agriculture Development | | | | |
| 45. | Shri Braj Kishore Sharma, RAEO
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the | Grounds: – serving in the State of M.P. for more than 20 years and going to retire on 31.05.2024. | Administrative Departments in Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and Govt. of Chhattisgarh have given their consent to the retention of the employee in State of Madhya Pradesh. | The request of the employee is not covered under allocation guidelines. However, keeping in view of the directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior, his request may be considered separately in consultation with the State Govts. || | Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 3671/2013 | Request not covered under allocation guidelines | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 46. | Shri Suresh Babu Sharma, SADO
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 3977/2015 | Grounds: – serving in the State of M.P. for more than 20 years and going to retire on 31.07.2023
Request not covered under allocation guidelines | Administrative Departments in Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and Govt. of Chhattisgarh have given their consent to the retention of the employee in State of Madhya Pradesh. | The request of the employee is not covered under allocation guidelines. However, keeping in view of the directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior, his request may be considered separately in consultation with the State Govts. |
| | | | Department of Home | |
| 47. | Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, ASI
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 4527/2012 | Grounds: – serving in the State of M.P. for more than 20 years and going to retire on 31.03.2025.
Request not covered under allocation guidelines | Administrative Department in Govt. of Madhya Pradesh has given its consent to the retention of the employees in State of Madhya Pradesh.
Govt. of Chhattisgarh has to provide its comments. | The request of the employee is not covered under allocation guidelines. However, keeping in view of the directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior, his request may be considered separately in consultation with the State Govts. |
| | | Department of Animal Husbandry (Veterinary Services) | | |
| 48. | Dr. Brij Kishor Sharma, Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, (Animal Husbandry Veterinary Services)
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 989/2014 | Grounds: – serving in the State of M.P. for more than 20 years and going to retire on 30.11.2026.
Request not covered under allocation guidelines | Administrative Department in Govt. of Madhya Pradesh has not recommended his request for acceptance.
Administrative Department in Govt. of Chhattisgarh has to provide its comments. | The request of the employee is not covered under allocation guidelines. However, keeping in view of the directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior, his request may be considered separately in consultation with the State Govts. || Department of Water Resources | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 49. | Shri Anil Jain,
Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 13.08.2007 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 10250/2007
WP No.10649/2019 | Grounds: – Many SubEngineers were allocated to MP following wrong criteria. Excess allocation of Sub-Engineers to MP
Request not covered under allocation guidelines | Administrative Departments in Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and Govt. of Chhattisgarh have given their consent to the retention of the employee in State of Madhya Pradesh. | The request of the employee is not covered under allocation guidelines. However, keeping in view of the directions dated 13.08.2007 of the Hon’ble High Court his request may be considered separately in consultation with the State Govts. |
| 50. | Shri Pankaj Chauhan, Sub-Engineer
WP 17699/2019 | Grounds: – His name is wrongly mentioned (Shri Hari Pankaj Chauhan) in the communication dated 05.07.2006 rejecting his representation. Thereafter, he has not again been communicated about rejection.
Request not covered under allocation guidelines | Administrative Department in Govt. of Madhya Pradesh has informed vide letter dated 09.04.2021 that his name should be rectified in the letter of rejection dated 05.07.2006 rejecting his representation.
Administrative Department in Govt. of Chhattisgarh conveyed ‘no objection’ to his reallocation to Govt. of Madhya Pradesh. | In view of submission of his Administrative Department in State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh, a corrigendum may be issued rectifying his name as Sh. Pankaj Chauhan in the letter of rejection dated 05.07.2006. A counter affidavit may be filed in the Hon’ble High Court accordingly. |
| Department of Water Resources | | | | |
| 51. | Shri Anand Kumar Tripathi, Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the | Request to be considered in the wake of directions of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh. | Administrative Department in Govt. of Madhya Pradesh has informed that no representation has been received from the employees | The Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh in its Order dated 05.03.2020 in WP No. 1361/2014 directed the petitioner to submit representation for consideration of his reallocation within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. Representation of the petitioner has not been received in DoPT. State Govt. too has confirmed that no representation has been received || | Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 3754/2013 | | and as such no comments can be offered.
Admin. Deptt. in Govt. of Chhattisgarh has given its consent to his retention in State of Madhya Pradesh. | from the employee. In the absence of any representation from the petitioner, a view can not be taken on his grievance regarding allocation. Therefore, the case may be dropped. |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| 52. | Shri Vishwanath Bansal, Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 1385/2014 | Grounds: – serving in the State of M.P. for more than 20 years and going to retire on 30.04.2025
Request to be considered in the wake of directions of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh.
Request not covered under allocation guidelines | Administrative Departments in the Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and Govt. of Chhattisgarh have given their no objection to retention of the employee in State of Madhya Pradesh. | The request of the employee is not covered under allocation guidelines. However, keeping in view of the directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court, his request may be considered separately in consultation with the State Govts. |
| Public Works Department | | | | |
| 53. | Shri Laxminarayan Gupta, Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 3485/2015 | Request to be considered in the wake of directions of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh. | Administrative Department in Govt. of Madhya Pradesh has to confirm whether any representation has been submitted by the petitioner in compliance of Court’s directions dated 05.03.2020. | The Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior in its Order dated 05.03.2020 in WP No. 1361/2014 directed the petitioner to submit representation for consideration of his reallocation within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. Representation of the petitioner has not been received in DoPT. State Govt. has yet to confirm whether any representation has been received from the employee. In the absence of any representation from the petitioner, a view can not be taken on his grievance regarding allocation. || 54. | Shri Ramsharan Rajoria, Sub-Engineer
Compliance of directions dated 05.03.2020 of the Hon’ble High Court of M.P. in WP No. 3955/2015 | Request to be considered in the wake of directions of the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh. | Administrative Department in Govt. of Madhya Pradesh has to confirm whether any representation has been submitted by the petitioner in compliance of Court’s directions dated 05.03.2020. | The Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior in its Order dated 05.03.2020 in WP No. 1361/2014 directed the petitioner to submit representation for consideration of his reallocation within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. Representation of the petitioner has not been received in DoPT. State Govt. has yet to confirm whether any representation has been received from the employee. In the absence of any representation from the petitioner, a view can not be taken on his grievance regarding allocation. |
| :–: | :–: | :–: | :–: | :–: |